Friday, June 1, 2012

FOXNews.com: Facebook to let users vote on privacy changes

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Facebook to let users vote on privacy changes
Jun 1st 2012, 16:10

NEW YORK –  Facebook is letting its nearly 1 billion users vote on changes to its privacy policy beginning on Friday.

This is the second time Facebook Inc. is letting users vote on policy changes. The first time was in 2009 when Facebook was a much smaller, privately held company with about 200 million users.

The vote is over updates the company announced in May, a week before its initial public offering. The changes include new sections explaining how it uses people's information. They open up the possibility for Facebook to start showing people ads on outside websites, targeting the pitches to interests and hobbies that users express on Facebook.

Facebook said in a blog post Friday that it is reviewing the voting process, signaling that it might be time to end it.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: How to borrow eBooks from the library

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
How to borrow eBooks from the library
Jun 1st 2012, 15:45

How would you like some free digital books for your summer reading list? Most people don't realize that they can borrow e-books from their local library on Kindle, Nook, or other digital readers. But indeed you can -- and I'm going to give you some tips on how.

Amazon Kindle: If you own a Kindle, you are well equipped for summertime reading since the device is small, light, and easy to see in direct sunlight. I like to throw mine in the pocket of my swim shorts on my way to the pool. Good thing I don't wear Speedos!

To get library books on your Kindle, make sure you have your Amazon.com login handy. Then visit your local library's website and browse the selection of e-books. When you find one you want, you will need to make sure it is now already lent out. Libraries don't have limitless digital copies to lend out. Much like real books, if someone else has it checked out, you've got to wait your turn.

If the book you want is available, be sure it is available in "Kindle format." Then click "check out." The software will then take you to the public library loan page on Amazon.com.

Four places for free e-books

Libraries aren't the only spot for free books. Here are four free, legal resources to help you find reading material.

Project Gutenberg
Created to digitize books in the public domain and making them freely available.

Kindle Store, NOOK Books, and iBookstore
Most titles offered by these giants cost money, but certain texts can be downloaded free.

Google Books
Google's project is similar to Project Gutenberg, but on an even larger scale.

Wikibooks
From the masterminds behind Wikipedia, Wikibooks provides free open-source info.

Read more

The next part can be a tad tricky. From the "deliver to" menu, pick "your Kindle". Choose "get library book," and it'll be sent right to your Kindle. The next time you open your Kindle and sync it online, you'll notice your lent book right there! Much like a physical book, you only get a few weeks to read your e-books. Once the loan period is up the book will vanish from your device.

Barnes and Noble's Nook and Sony's eReader: Getting a library book on these devices is a bit more cumbersome. Follow these steps to make set up a breeze.

First download Adobe Digital Editions from Adobe's website. Once you've downloaded it click "launch" to install the software on your computer. The software will help you manage the books you borrow from the library.

Once you've completed the installation process you'll need to create an Adobe ID. You'll have to create an Adobe account as well, and once that's done your account is good to go. Just enter your new Adobe ID and password and activate the software.

A new screen will pop up for Adobe Digital Editions and it'll ask you to connect your Nook or eReader via USB cable. Next you'll have to go through another screen that says "device set up assistant" and it'll ask you to "authorize device". Once you've authorized your device just click "finished."

Then you want to head back over to your library's website and pick the book that you want. When you're checking out make sure you pick the EPUB format. That's the format that Adobe's software uses. Unlike the Kindle which transfers your book wirelessly, you'll need to plug your device into your computer to transfer that book from the library to your device. This process is a bit trickier than the Kindle set up, but once you do it you'll get the hang of it very quickly.

Don't forget that both the Barnes & Noble Nook and Amazon Kindle have apps for the iPad. That means you can borrow books from your local library and read them on your favorite tablet.

There's one big problem with borrowing e-books from your local library. Getting new releases can be a bit of a pain because of long waiting lists. Libraries are trying to find a solution for this but for now you're better off reading a book that you've been meaning to read for a few years.

If all this seems a bit complicated to you, don't worry. It was a little complicated to me at first too. I fumbled my way through the process but if you don't want to do that, many libraries offer classes on how to use e-readers. The libraries will walk you through the setup process and you'll be off on the beach towel soon enough.

Clayton Morris is a Fox and Friends host. Follow Clayton's adventures online on Twitter @ClaytonMorris and by reading his daily updates at his blog.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: People over 55 pick more secure passwords than 25-year-olds

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
People over 55 pick more secure passwords than 25-year-olds
Jun 1st 2012, 16:28

Sorry, gen Y: Your parents are smarter about safety online.

Despite the digital savvy of younger generations, people over age 55 pick passwords that are twice as secure as those chosen by people under age 25, according to a new study by University of Cambridge computer scientist Joseph Bonneau.

"There is a general trend towards better password selection with users' age," Bonneau wrote in his study, the largest ever of password security, which was presented at the 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.

Take that, millennial generation!

But before older websurfers start crowing, take note of Bonneau's larger conclusion: no one makes passwords that are secure enough, regardless of age.

"The most troubling finding of our study is how little password distributions seem to vary … with effective security varying by no more than a few bits," he wrote.

On average, he found that it would only take around 1,000 attempts to try every possible password and eventually crack them, according to an analysis in New Scientist. That's surprising, because even a randomly chosen six-character password composed of digits and upper and lower case letters should offer far more security.

Lujo Bauer, who studies passwords at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pa., told New Scientists that Bonneau's findings were legitimate.

"This is one of the rare studies based on a large set of passwords that are actively used and have been obtained legitimately," he said.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Huge spike expected in employer Facebook snooping

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Huge spike expected in employer Facebook snooping
Jun 1st 2012, 12:08

In a world where it's not uncommon for bosses to ask to see their employees' Facebook profiles, when does seemingly innocent, or even beneficial "monitoring" turn into privacy-infringing "snooping"?

It's a question many more employees may be asking in the next three years, according to a new Gartner report which predicts that by 2015, 60 percent of corporations are expected to put formal programs in place for "monitoring external social media for security breaches."

Companies traditionally rely on analyzing internal computing infrastructure to detect vulnerabilities, Gartner said; by monitoring their employees' Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and LinkedIn feeds, these companies could take advantage of critical and potentially damaging information being put out into the social media world.

[Employers May Face Legal Troubles Over Facebook Snooping]

'Employees on social media can ... embarrass their employers.'

- Sophos analyst Lisa Vaas

"In other words, the development of effective security intelligence and control depends on the ability to capture and analyze user actions that take place inside and outside of the enterprise IT environment," Andrew Walls, research vice president of Gartner, wrote in the report, "Conduct Digital Surveillance Ethically and Legally: 2012 Update."

Gartner says less than 10 percent of companies currently monitor employees' social media profiles as part of their security monitoring programs. It's a practice that can "both mitigate and create risk," Walls said.

The predicted spike in monitoring, even if it's ostensibly for security purposes, highlights the ethical gray area surrounding social networking privacy, especially between employers and their staff. In March, Facebook announced it would consider taking legal action against employers who demanded the usernames and passwords of potential job applicants. And the monitoring versus snooping debate is best (or worst) exemplified by Google's Street View cars, which, under the guise of collecting Wi-Fi access points, actually swiped far more personal information in the process.

Lisa Vaas from the security company Sophos agreed that social media does present security risks: "Employees on social media can give away trade secrets or simply act like unprofessional idiots and thereby embarrass their employers," she wrote. "They can also click on scams in Facebook," which could harm the company's internal networks.

Vaas has some advice for companies implementing the monitoring programs. "As we move toward workplaces with ever more pervasive surveillance, I'd suggest that organizations take the time to study the privacy laws," she said in a Sophos blog post. "Those laws continue to evolve. You might be within your rights today, but seen as a leering Big Brother tomorrow."

Copyright 2012 SecurityNewsDaily, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Google smacks down Oracle as smartphone trial of century ends

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Google smacks down Oracle as smartphone trial of century ends
Jun 1st 2012, 12:45

San Francisco –  Oracle Corp. received another setback Thursday as a federal judge in San Francisco undermined a central part of the company's multimillion dollar case against Google over its Android software for mobile devices.

Oracle had accused Google of copyright infringement in using "application programming interfaces," or APIs, that help Oracle's Java software work effectively. A jury found Google infringed on those APIs on May 7, but it couldn't agree on whether Google was covered under "fair use" protections in U.S. law. Without a fair-use determination, Oracle wasn't able to extract huge sums from Google.

Now, U.S. District Judge William Alsup said Google's use of the APIs wasn't covered by copyright law in the first place.

TECH TRIAL OF THE CENTURY

Oracle has accused Google of patent infringement over Google's Android, the mobile OS that now powers more than 300 million smartphones and tablets.

Jan. 27, 2010: Oracle closes deal to buy Sun Microsystems, gets Java platform.

Aug. 12: Oracle sues Google in U.S. District Court, says Android infringes on Java.

Sept. 12, 2011: Company CEOs try to settle.

March 27, 2012: In a joint statement, companies say they are hundreds of millions of dollars apart.

April 16: Trial begins. Oracle says Google knowingly stole their tech.

April 17: Google frames the case as Oracle's response to its own failure to build mobile software.

May 1: Lawyers make closing arguments. Judge sends case to jury for deliberation.

May 7: In a partial verdict, the jury found that Google infringed on the largest of Oracle's claims, but it couldn't agree on whether this was protected under "fair use."

May 23: Jury rules that Google did not infringe on Oracle's patents.

The effect of Thursday's ruling is limited because a jury had earlier reached an impasse on the issue of fair use. But the ruling could be important in any appeals.

And Oracle said it will appeal the ruling.

Android now powers more than 300 million smartphones and tablet computers. Those devices are the chief competitors to Apple's iPhones and iPads. Google has driven the adoption of Android by giving the software away to manufacturers of phones and tablets. That would have been more difficult for Google to keep doing if the court had found that Google needed to pay Oracle millions of dollars to license Java technology.

The jury in the case had been asked to rule on the infringement and fair use questions on the assumption that the APIs were copyrightable. Alsup deferred a ruling on the broader copyright question until after the trial, which ended May 23.

Alsup ruled Thursday that Google didn't use Oracle's exact programming code in Android, but rather wrote its own code to produce the same functions. Although Google used some of the same phrases in the code, Alsup said it had to do so to maintain interoperability. Names, titles and short phrases aren't covered by copyright, and Google's use of those phrases amounted to that, he said.

"In sum, Google and the public were and remain free to write their own implementations to carry out exactly the same functions of all methods in question, using exactly the same method specifications and names," Alsup said.

'It's a good day for collaboration and innovation.'

- Google statement

In a statement, Google said "the court's decision upholds the principle that open and interoperable computer languages form an essential basis for software development. It's a good day for collaboration and innovation."

Oracle countered that Alsup's ruling would "make it far more difficult to defend intellectual property rights against companies anywhere in the world that simply takes them as their own."

Alsup's ruling does not affect the jury's determination that Android infringed on nine lines of Java coding, but the penalty for that violation is confined to statutory damages no higher than $150,000. Oracle had been seeking hundreds of millions of dollars from Google on the API questions.

The jury has also cleared Google of infringing two Oracle patents.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Google challenges China censorship with new search tool

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Google challenges China censorship with new search tool
Jun 1st 2012, 11:58

BEIJING –  Google has begun notifying Chinese users when they are using search terms that can trigger China's Internet blocks, in its boldest challenge in two years to Beijing's efforts to restrict online content.

The search giant unveiled on its Chinese site this week a new mechanism that identifies political and other sensitive terms that are censored by Chinese authorities.

For example, when users search for keywords like "carrot" -- which contains the character for Chinese president Hu Jintao's surname -- a yellow dropdown message says: "We've observed that searching for 'hu' in mainland China may temporarily break your connection to Google. This interruption is outside Google's control."

'We've observed that searching for 'hu' in mainland China may temporarily break your connection to Google. This interruption is outside Google's control.'

- Google warning to Chinese users

Google acknowledged on its official blog Thursday that users in China are having trouble accessing its services, saying failed searches can impair performance on the site. "Users are regularly getting error messages like 'This webpage is not available' or 'The connection was reset,' " the post said.

Google says it hopes the alerts "will help improve the search experience in mainland China," where Google's search and other services have been unstable since it entered a public spat with Chinese authorities over censorship over two years ago. A Google spokesman declined to comment further.

Chinese officials do not discuss their Internet restrictions, and its search terms are treated as state secrets. In its post, Google said the trigger terms were identified based on reviews of the outcomes of the 350,000 most popular search queries in China, not an official list.

The post does not mention censorship, or explicitly say Chinese authorities are the cause of the blocks.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Liu Weimin said at a regular press briefing Friday that "there are more than 500 million Internet users in China, and they have access to plenty of information ... Like other countries, China also administers its Internet according to law."

China's restrictions include the names of top leaders as well as high-profile dissidents like blind legal activist Chen Guangcheng and references to the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and crackdown.

The move is the most significant Google has made related to China's Internet restrictions since early 2010, when it publicly said it would not adhere to China's censorship policies and said it might have to shut down its Google.cn China site as well as its offices there.

Google ultimately kept its China offices but moved its web search and other services to Hong Kong, where it does not have to comply with regulations in mainland China.

Read more on Google's struggles with China in the Wall Street Journal.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Milky Way galaxy doomed to head-on crash with Andromeda galaxy

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Milky Way galaxy doomed to head-on crash with Andromeda galaxy
Jun 1st 2012, 11:45

Four billion years from now, the Milky Way galaxy as we know it will cease to exist.

Our Milky Way is bound for a head-on collision with the similar-sized Andromeda galaxy, researchers announced today (May 31). Over time, the huge galactic smashup will create an entirely new hybrid galaxy, one likely bearing an elliptical shape rather than the Milky Way's trademark spiral-armed disk.

"We do know of other galaxies in the local universe around us that are in the process of colliding and merging," Roeland van der Marel, of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, told reporters today. "However, what makes the future merger of the Andromeda galaxy and the Milky Way so special is that it will happen to us."

Astronomers have long known that the Milky Way and Andromeda, which is also known as M31, are barrelling toward one another at a speed of about 250,000 mph (400,000 kph). They have also long suspected that the two galaxies may slam into each other billions of years down the road. [Milky Way Slams Into Andromeda (Artist Images)]

However, such discussions of the future galactic crash have always remained somewhat speculative, because no one had managed to measure Andromeda's sideways motion —  a key component of that galaxy's path through space.

But that's no longer the case.

Van der Marel and his colleagues used NASA's Hubble space telescope to repeatedly observe select regions of Andromeda over a seven-year period. They were able to measure the galaxy's sideways (or tangential) motion, and they found that Andromeda and the Milky Way are indeed bound for a direct hit.

"The Andromeda galaxy is heading straight in our direction," van der Marel said. "The galaxies will collide, and they will merge together to form one new galaxy." He and his colleagues also created a video simulation of the Milky Way crash into Andromeda.

That merger, van der Marel added, begins in 4 billion years and will be complete by about 6 billion years from now.

A future cosmic crash

Such a dramatic event has never occurred in the long history of our Milky Way, which likely began taking shape about 13.5 billion years ago.

"The Milky Way has had, probably, quite a lot of small, minor mergers," said Rosemary Wyse of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, who was not affiliated with the new study. "But this major merger will be unprecedented."

The merger poses no real danger of destroying Earth or our solar system, researchers said. The stretches of empty space separating the stars in the two galaxies will remain vast, making any collisions or serious perturbations unlikely.

However, our solar system will likely get booted out to a different position in the new galaxy, which some astronomers have dubbed the "Milkomeda galaxy." Simulations show that we'll probably occupy a spot much farther from the galactic core than we do today, researchers said.

A new night sky

And the collision will change our night sky dramatically. If any humans are still around 3.75 billion years from now, they'll see Andromeda fill their field of view as it sidles up next to our own Milky Way. For the next few billion years after that, stargazers will be spellbound by the merger, which will trigger intense bouts of star formation.

Finally, by about 7 billion years from now, the bright core of the elliptical Milkomeda galaxy will dominate the night sky, researchers said. (The odds of viewing this sight, at least from Earth, are pretty slim, since the sun is predicted to bloat into a huge red giant 5 or 6 billion years from now.)

In its 22-year history, Hubble has revolutionized the way humanity views the cosmos. The new finding is another step in that process, researchers said.

"What's really exciting about the current measurements is, it's not about historical astronomy; it's not about looking back in time, understanding the expansion of the universe," said John Grunsfeld, associate administrator for NASA's Science Mission Directorate and a former astronaut who flew on three space shuttle missions that repaired Hubble .

"It's looking forward in time, which is another very human story," Grunsfeld added. "We like to know about our past — where did we come from? We very much like to know where we're going."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.